By Editor in Chief: Ali Kassem
عنوان البريد الإلكتروني هذا محمي من روبوتات السبام. يجب عليك تفعيل الجافاسكربت لرؤيته.
The Turkish positions, especially those of the head of the regime, continue to occupy the greater part of the fantasy of assumptions and possibilities, leading to a large number of lies that mimic his ambitions. The most recent of which is the creation of an army of mercenaries, which is to be an alternative to the American one, filling the void and performing the tasks that make it difficult for Turkey to enter into its challenges, setting wishes and illusions about placing the region under the guardianship after the American exit.
The dilemma is that the alignments that rise in the face of contrast and contradiction in the American talk about the withdrawal are colliding with wall of formulas for a set of field indicators that allow the Turkish and other functional tools to exaggerate refloating harbingers resulted from previous dreams mixed with disappointments of what were authorized by functional roles. However, the additional conditions came to draw a shadow of doubt and mistrust on the secrets of the American decision, which paves the way to promote trading illusion, taking advantage of stretches caused by the swelling of the Turkish dreams in particular.
The Turkish duel is not limited to improving the conditions of the political mercenaries, and are not determined by the points of agreement and the differences in the political approach that are clearly oriented toward promoting this unsold trade. They also include different aspects of the direct approach that tries to imagine that it can extract the American mandate, to authorize the Turkish side according to the policies desired by the current administration, so that the collision will not be on the political and field quotas, nor on the mercenaries and their form and components, but on the repetition of the failed experiments which tried before the Turkish by an American open mandate and financial and military support legalized from the successive administrations of the United States, where Israel is still tasting bitter disappointments and accumulations.
The search for mercenaries in the Turkish concept transcended the usual scene in all of the previous experiences, where the reliance here on the illusions and morbid swellings that have become an essential part of the complex conditions that reproduced by the Turkish in a way that simulates his different wishes. The dilemma here emerges in conditions and counter conditions through which the Turkish side bets on making alone the decision of mercenaries on the one hand, and getting rid of the consequences of the terrorist organizations that it established over the past years on the other hand, so that the crisis it faced in the relationship with those organizations turns into solutions shared with the American, while sharing the spoils of terrorism with the Israelis for the expertise they provide.
The project appears to have been captured by Americans on more than one level. What Erdogan wrote to address the Americans in the New York Times reveals the conclusions he wants and seeks to devote through a project that will replace the American project in investing in terrorism and simulating the various phases of the Western crisis, especially the Western fears of the return of terrorists who drop by dozens through the paths provided by the Turkish regime in the back journey, marked by a set of equations that began to appear and form, and the special rules of engagement in which the guarantor is the American side and the performer is the Turkish one, and the Europeans are the sponsor. Until that time, it seems that the search is still underway for mercenaries not at the level of the field, which has been guaranteed by the Turkish regime, but at the political level where the congestion among the regional sponsors is at its peak and the competition is raging, and while the circuit suffers from excess overflowing.
Translated by Amal Suleiman Ma'rouf