By Editor in Chief: Ali Kassem
عنوان البريد الإلكتروني هذا محمي من روبوتات السبام. يجب عليك تفعيل الجافاسكربت لرؤيته.
Warsaw Summit raises a lot of question marks about the situation in the Middle East and the search for a way to deal with its problems, in the face of an escalating debate on agendas with different whims that added more ambiguity albeit being intended themselves.
This opened the appetite of the participants to raise the ceiling of their dealing with proposals including wishes that were more than realities, evidenced by that the head of the Israeli government has tweeted far away by his demands so the summit for him is greater than its size and surpassing its capacity, as he tries to legitimize his aggression on others.
The American interest, which gave momentum to the summit, was not available to see the light without it. In some scenes, there is talking about the fetch memos distributed to participants without a clear agenda, and without defined headlines. Moreover, that has been done without taking into account the concerns expressed by some parties warning of the risks of almost inevitable failure.
The participation of the US vice president and his secretary of state reflects that concern, while the scenes provide a detailed explanation of the nature of the bilateral meetings that surpassed the official ones, especially those related to the Israeli role of incitement and trying to bring things to the point that Netanyahu can hide his many disappointments, which have become floating repellently.
The leaks of the arrangements presented by the US administration show that reliance is not on the outputs and their seriousness and feasibility, which raise dozens of questions, as it depends on the direct repercussions on the regional movement, headed by creating confuses about the summit of Sochi, where synchronization here is not by chance evidenced by the number and size of agendas of the summit in Poland, which doesn't limited to regional dimensions, but the geographical factor will be there in two main points. The first related to the Russian neighborhood, and the second linked to the role of Poland during the next stage.
This does not diminish the factors that lead to the assertion that the context related to the summit is a hectic attempt to fill a vacuum that everyone has begun to sense its limits, especially as it is primarily a result of the American political re-positioning, leaving areas that the US tools are aware of their sense of inability to fill those vacant places along the functional marginalized role.
Poland, which is looking for a scene that brings its capital to political deliberations, is like many of those who have been forced to participate, is colliding with a ball that is forced to catch up amid fears of a backlash, which will earn far less than the trouble it will face, since there is a European resentment to move the political weight leaving clear gaps in the order and role.
Warsaw, which until recently, was linked to the memory of the Cold War and its bickering, is re-announcing the launch of its fuse in the opposite side, and is generally striving to re-coordinate the scene to fit the size of wishes that contradict with the facts, data and even decisions, especially under the grumble and resentment of many Europeans with its whole geographical surrounding .. !!
Translated by Amal Suleiman Ma'rouf