By Editor in Chief: Ali Kassem
عنوان البريد الإلكتروني هذا محمي من روبوتات السبام. يجب عليك تفعيل الجافاسكربت لرؤيته.
It was not the first time that the United States exercised its arrogance, even though it came through its back channels including the Congress - in a way closer to a test balloon to read the reaction about the Syrian occupied Arab Golan. It has already proposed that in the narrow and extensive meetings, and in the closed and open rooms, to draw the coordinates of a new scene in the reality of the region, based on satisfying the Israeli ambitions.
The region does not need additional factors of tension and aggression for the American Senator Lindsey Graham comes to fuel the fire, in a situation where we cannot rule out the electoral dimension and the implications of the relationship based on Israel's satisfaction with the rights of others and at the expense of them, with unprecedented political impudence reflected the grim reality of the US policymakers.
The Golan fate has never been linked to the US decision, nor to the whims of an extremist senator. It is also not limited to tommyrots, which the American tries to divert the surplus of power in hegemony, to impose what is not of its rights and cannot be in any case. The difference here is not only in legal and moral paradox, but also in a political context that would be incapable to change the truth.
But the dilemma does not stop at the limits of the political level and its electoral outcome, but extends to include more serious dimensions in the context of the political worn situation. The region, over the past decade of a heavy price for the projects of domination and aggression, which its cost surpassed the capacity of the region to bear, at the time wanted to compensate or hide the failure of the terrorist project and its accompanying warnings.
The core issue is that the United States itself has agreed to international resolutions that recognize Syrian sovereignty over the occupied Syrian Golan and demand that Israel withdraw from it. Over the past decades, Israel has opposed any proposal to change this reality. This matter raises questions about the hidden reasons beyond this try?
In the conclusion, the issue is related to the American internal considerations through the swollen bidding on the American administration itself, as it is related to the Israeli electoral situation. Its main purpose is to provide Netanyahu with reasons for staying in his post after being plagued by scandals of corruption and bribery. So, this can help him to temporary exceed the obstacles and get out of the bottleneck, while the facts tend to use the surplus of the American hegemony and impose its will on the peoples of the region.
The American plying in the region's axioms is like playing with fire and sliding to the edge of the abyss, and in some of its manifestations. It is a slide inside it, with all of its unpredictable consequences, especially with the crystallization of a set of new ambitions that represent the most serious challenge in the region, in the light of the American insistence to generalize chaos and devastation, starting from the remnants of projects and schemes.
The Golan is in the eye of arrogance and in the heart of hegemony .. The land of Syria is non-negotiable nor for blackmail, or bargain. The US Congress tries is to satisfy the Zionist pressure lobbies will not change the historical fact that the Golan is a part of the Syrian territory, and that the existing occupation will be removed as previous occupation was removed before, and as the US occupation and the Turkish and other will be removed from every spot in Syria, since the Syrians will not fail to find the way to regain every inch of the Syrian territory.
Translated by Amal Suleiman Ma'rouf