By Editor in Chief: Ali Kassem
عنوان البريد الإلكتروني هذا محمي من روبوتات السبام. يجب عليك تفعيل الجافاسكربت لرؤيته.
The frantic race to re-float Netanyahu enters the final stages and critical moments. It is not limited to the Americans, but Russia went to mimic the American scenario in a way that seemed to test the limits of effect and sphere of influence, rather than deliberately embarrassing, in a move that is difficult to digest or explain when offering the body of the Israeli soldier, in a dangerous precedent that minimizes the desire to counter the American in the nearest cards, but it raises a whirlwind of serious possibilities, which at least stumble in marketing rationalities and confusion to the limits of fallacy in details.
The American president has not only taken steps to Judaize the Israeli occupation and to rape the rest of the Arab land in a gamble, which its repercussions will not end at the Israeli elections, which are meant to be at Netanyahu's size superficially and content.
The talk about annexing settlements and keeping Israeli control to be the spearhead of the next step that targets the entire West Bank, putting it in the range of the Israeli and American ambitions in a process that is no longer excluded by Americans and President Trump personally in the moments leading up to the elections, to be the last in the quiver to clone re-election, albeit in the form of forced flotation.
"Competition" here by this method raises dozens of questions that are difficult to answer, and perhaps impossible in the context of any comparison, headed by the benefit will be gained by the Americans and others to float a looser at the Zionist interior, and a corrupt according to the descriptions accompanying him, and aggressive in most of the political literature?
The fundamental question in the approach is that this American-Russian "competition" is almost the most disquieting breach in the chain of probabilities on which based various political analyses resulting from the ambiguity surrounding the position and the desire to keep Netanyahu in the spotlight of politics in spite of others.
If it is understood and known that the American-Israeli relationship is not related or depend on the existence of Netanyahu or any other, as it is not depended on the presence of Trump or others, though he is the most obvious blind bias to Israel, when giving it free rein to its aggression and hatred of his faction of the hotheads in the American administration, so the hardest question, and perhaps, the puzzling one remains related to the Russian side, which needs an answer that isn't heard until the moment.
The most dangerous approach is the debate about the American proposed steps in the context of the competition with the Russian for the Israeli courtship. It is an assertion of the ability to re-float Netanyahu, without the need to the Russian in this matter. This increases the complications of the scene in the frantic race to take the lead in promoting the next winner within scenario rearranging the Israeli house, to be the most flexible card in the struggle for influence and control of the track of attraction in the interrelationship, and in the climate of international relations.
The Americans have repeatedly erred in the blind bias and the accumulation of error under an American administration, which does not hesitate to formulate the regional scene to meet the requirements of Israel's aggressive demands, while the Russian position - which remains outside any comparison - is close to the limits of sin, which can't be justified or understood. It will need more than clarification and explanation, and perhaps required to reach the limits of the review .. !!
Translated by Amal Suleiman Ma'rouf