When enough is enough

By Editor in Chief: Ali Kassem
عنوان البريد الإلكتروني هذا محمي من روبوتات السبام. يجب عليك تفعيل الجافاسكربت لرؤيته.
The latest Israeli recklessness aggression appears to be of different aspects and messages in a number of directions, in terms of timing, style, and trend, while direct conclusions are not absent in reaffirming Israeli arrogance after the elections and refloating Netanyahu again.
The first approach seems to be totally local, through which he wants to satisfy the extremists who need them to form a new government, so he could impose his conditions before they think of putting more of them, in a game that has become scandalous.. !!
The second approach is an international one, and the inciting factor cannot be ignored as it is the gate of pressure, through which it wants to evade obligations that have formed one of the objects of bargaining over its floating, while his recklessness and its repercussions will close the door on what has preceded and open it to search for surrounding its direct effects, where new rules cancel the old ones.
The third aspect by its regional dimension, in which Israel wanted to say that the current rules of engagement are still subject to the criteria of Israeli calculations, besides the freedom of movement covered by the American green light in the practice of all directions and levels while they are untold internationally, including those that viewed with suspicion and criticism to those reckless aggressions that were missed even from warning of their consequences.
It is certain that Netanyahu hasn't go to his latest recklessness accidently as much as it was intended in timing, in which he wanted to reveal an early account to his opponents and entourage on the Israeli side, and simulated with its abroad, according to which he would measure the way to deal with deferred files, or those he deported until after the Israeli elections, while some of them at least were due.
The difference does not depend on the Israeli emulation in its recklessness on the political context and the reaction, but extend to the entire regional scene, as a described aggression in its position and targeting. It lacks the pretexts he used to justify his ongoing aggression, which leaves wide space in terms of repercussions and possibilities, which were previously controlled by the rules of engagement that lost its effectiveness, where their effects surpass regional scene in condemnation and denunciation to reach the limit of direct actual steps from the same sample, which will not only upturn the table, but will re-form many equations and the arrangement of many calculations.
The recklessness that Netanyahu adopted, puts an end to what was before and starts a new chapter separated from the previous one, though it relates to what he has accumulated, but it certainly differs in the way, method, means, tools and emulations of its previous lines, where the scene is shaped by the consequences of the Israeli character itself and won't end at the limits of the red lines that have expired.
It is enough and we fed up. The beginning after the Israeli reckless aggression is different from what was before it. What Netanyahu relies on, increases the fragility of the regional scene, which collapses in front of his eyes, since tomorrow's order is required today, and what was postponed became urgent and necessary, and it is at the core of priorities that rearrange their alignment as a part of the confrontation, and perhaps at its heart, where the arm of the Israeli aggression must be broken with those who protect it .. !!
Translated by Amal Suleiman Ma'rouf