By Editor in Chief: Ali Kassem
عنوان البريد الإلكتروني هذا محمي من روبوتات السبام. يجب عليك تفعيل الجافاسكربت لرؤيته.
The erroneous bets with the race's shows increase to get the American satisfaction to market the sin of the century, which its first steps began at the Bahrain workshop in an initial bombing of deceptive economic temptations that will not stop at the limits and space of some of the proposed supplemented details of what is being planned across the region in distorted reproduction to Balfour Declaration, but surpasses it in terms of dangerousness and catastrophe, not only in the region, but the whole world.
The issue of the Arab-Israeli conflict, which was triggered by the Balfour Declaration, remained a constant source of dangers that have not ended until the moment. It was a direct cause of the destruction and depletion of the region's capabilities, bringing dozens of wars along it. It also promises of many of other wars in the shadow of the eroding of the largest part of the data of the Arab's real ground in front of that sin planted by colonial ambitions.
Today, the colonial sin comes back with an American cover, which inherited the accumulations of the British Empire added to all of the mortal sins that have been rooted in the American unilateral mentality and its surplus power, with some additional fragmentation of the conspiracy that tries to transcend the confrontations that the Zionist project has faced over the past years with the necessary tools that accept what the Arab leaderships fail to accept it for 100 years do, while some of them were running to get the American and Israeli satisfaction.
The difference that ends in the context of the experiment is the return to the role played by many of the warnings that arose out of the so-called deal of the century, which seemed to express itself in the context of experience, as it is clearly the path to the sin of the century, which the Balfour Declaration embodies past sin, the deal of the century represents the next sin, which is the functional role of some countries form a central pivot of its components and one of its most important bearers.
Many of the questions raised at that time about the concept of functional role, the moment of actual entitlement to start it came, as many began to race towards them despite resentment and anger. The participation of some of them in the Doha workshop came under this heading, and that the presence of those countries at stake and all considerations that arise from them are mainly linked to the functional role that is intended to cover the troubles faced by Americans and Israelis, after the large opposition that met him at the public and elites' levels, and some at the official one.
What we are witnessing of the rush to provide free services and to participate, reflect the facts, despite the obvious fears some feel and that the solutions will be at their expense, and that compromises and bargains will be on their existence, specifically those countries facing the dilemma of the functional role, and bear the burden of bullying by it over the past decades. So, the praise was not for their eyes, nor a recognition of their presence, as much as reflecting the desire to implement what the Zionist project failed to achieve, including «alternative homeland», and the emerging or proposed states on the sidelines of the deal.
The differentiation here is not about the past, but many of them on the present, and some on the saliva that followed the promises of the Americans in the mirage of Bahrain as they distribute their gifts from the account of the sheikhdoms and their clones, up to the consequences for Arabians to be the present proving witnesses of the sin of the century, and a presumption on the separating line between the pitfalls of US policy and the sins of its followers in the region and beyond, in a game in which the pursuit of a functional role is renewed, to be consistent with the updated maps and their fragmentations.
Translated by Amal Suleiman Ma'rouf