By Editor in Chief: Ali Kassem
عنوان البريد الإلكتروني هذا محمي من روبوتات السبام. يجب عليك تفعيل الجافاسكربت لرؤيته.
The American begging at the Europeans' gates trying to impose their compliance, is no longer a political controversial phenomenon. It is also not a mobilization perspective through which Americans want to score additional points, just as it is a tacit acknowledgment that the bet on time wasn't futile at a time that seems to add pressures on the Americans in the region and beyond, while their dues push to be hurry in the implementation of what is deferred.
On this foundation, the Americans' demand from Germany to send troops to the Syrian Jazira canton, was not outside the context of the American attempt, which seemed more urgent despite the German rapid rejection of its intention to respond due to the sensitivity of the German role and its difficult considerations, as rejection here is not the end. It is also not the first nor the last of the American attempts to float the scene and prepare the theater for the next round of developments, which the region as a whole seems to be at its core, and perhaps beyond.
Americans, who have an additional heating tour because of the backdrop of the Iranian dossier and the failure of the Europeans to implement their pledges, are betting on the difference here in order to apply pressures on the Europeans in general and the Germans in particular to snatch positions that will drag them to save the Americans from the plight of filling vacuum they think that it is inevitable necessity, in order to carry out the next task of escalation.
The American exploitation of Europeans' concerns about the loss of control over the nuclear agreement, the compulsion for open confrontation, going into the difficult and almost impossible calculations that Washington sees as the main point to apply the maximum pressure and the gate from which can be accessed, up to implementing the scenario of the arrangements for the US to get out of the plight of drowning in the quagmire, where it responds to the minimum requirements, calculations and equations by which Washington anticipates the future events.
The American calculations didn't match the European field according to the arrangements here, specifically in the German side. They appear to be necessarily in conflict with a set of assumptions that make Germany re-arranges the accounts based on refusing to get involved because of the German participation that will provoke internal opposition, which the Chancellor Merkel won't be able to bear consequences of such a decision as she prepares to leave.
The most dangerous here is what is circulated in the scope of the American decision about the presence in the Syrian Jazira canton, and the clashes among the various forces there, whatever were the form and space of this presence, where the Europeans and Germans don't miss that the American encouragement doesn't come because of the desire for the European participation in the investment stage and before it after ISIS, as much as it bears its consequences.
The German diplomatic initial rejection has a public and temporary feature in practice. However, any other alternative or different decision will cause to Germany and Europeans a lot of horrors being arranged at their expense, whether they accepted or rejected, especially that the poor missions and crumbs of the political positions can not establish a sound or logical decision, especially when it is linked to nostalgia for the colonial past and its political outdated remains, and what remains of the crumbs of the international tables.
Translated by Amal Suleiman Ma'rouf