By Editor in Chief: Ali Kassem
عنوان البريد الإلكتروني هذا محمي من روبوتات السبام. يجب عليك تفعيل الجافاسكربت لرؤيته.
Despite that concern, attention and priority may be directed at terrorist organizations and their practices in the remaining hotspots, before the absence or deliberated absence and perhaps even systematic approach to the danger posed by the parallel terrorist organizations hotspots embodied by the militias, which arose at the root of the terrorist project itself and within it. Perhaps, some of their features are more dangerous due to their physical presence on the ground besides their internal structural formation.
However, this could not conceal the current danger, at any moment and in all circumstances, in calculating the political emulation and the balance it occupies within the components of the terrorist project. One of the most malignant swelling has emerged resulting from distortions with selling illusions that happened in the political approaches about its roles, future and presence on the field map , and according to the political scene to produce final, or semi-final, resulting alliances, including the US-Turkish coalition and its fate.
The practices of Qasad militia and its clones are no longer limited to the role of the political mercenaries and described treachery in dealing with Israel, nor to the looting of Syrian oil, or to the theft of livestock from the peasants after abusing them and imposing tributes, but in Qasad's previous and future role in following the American orders, up to what is relied in those expected alliances, and intersections they form in the future.
The pathological extensions and swellings of the role, position, goal and agenda may reset the deferred questions, but they also hasten to redraft many of the approaches on the awaited ends, after they have become a «phenomenon» trying to present itself in a different way in the role of the US agent and the commanding under its name and the one who controls the scenes whether inside or outside those alliances.
The facts repeat all of the previous experiences. Also, they restore with them all the previous reviews as a part of the political legacy, that is almost identical in its components, despite the different historical situation, international relations and balances of powers in the regional and international scene, while the result seems to be repeatable.
The only difference is that it is inevitable and urgent, and it can't be postponed. So, the preoccupation or taking lights far away from them and their practices besides the spread of many their swellings, don't mean that they are not under monitoring and control.
The difference may be in the timing of approach, and in timing of engagement, which must be reconsidered as a priority to prevent the imminent danger. It is the most obvious danger, and the most commonly used within the terrorist support system, and within the calculations of the American project itself.
The change of priorities does not, in any way, mean the decline of the field treatment of terrorism in its direct form, and through the continuation of the fight against terrorist organizations until eradicating them, but all that means, very simply, that it closes the deadlines, adjusts timing, and changes the method of treatment. So, what was left to the politics, has become useless with it , and what has no politics in it, must be the only option available represented by non-political treatment. When swelling spreads and illusion swells, the solution is to eradicate the state of terrorism .. !!
Translated by Amal Suleiman Ma'rouf