By Editor in Chief: Ali Kassem
عنوان البريد الإلكتروني هذا محمي من روبوتات السبام. يجب عليك تفعيل الجافاسكربت لرؤيته.
Some promote arguments that tend towards the excuse search to justify a situation here or a scene there. Some take the search for justifications to add a lot of details that appear to be outside the context, far away from the original text of the political approach to developments and its different scenes, specifically when it comes to Idlib and its neighborhood with the role of the Turkish regime as aggression and occupation, driven by intentions that don't come without a false briefing .. !!
Perhaps what is being circulated to explain some of the field data and developments on the ground, specifically with regard to the Turkish observation points and the way of dealing with the terrorist organizations that sponsored them, takes the tendency of these arguments with more justifiable reasons, and sometimes they are an integral part of the misleading public relations campaign to market what has failed to achieve by terrorism, through contexts that seem closer to the completion of the Turkish trickery that has reached the impasse.
The debate in this narrow circle and this limited space make the approaches and analyses within a maze, which others and the Western aggression system in general wanted them to be a part of the most dangerous propaganda, especially after they largely lost media control, which was moving before any field test, which was often a matter of operations command for terrorist organizations, was widely used.
More importantly, when politics are closed or difficult, the field is a natural way, given that the terrorist presence cannot be ignored under any slogan, which explains the reliance on marketing some misperceptions based on a misreading of the political context and the equations that arise at the root besides the illogical justifications in understanding the details on the agenda of the stage.
The Turkish regime, which has lost the latest justification, missing the last opportunity, betting on time, which hasn't help it to maintain the terrorist situation or benefit from it and use it for the benefit of the agendas it has drown. This regime finds itself in front of the hammer of the commitments it made to the Russian in accordance with the understandings of Sochi and the anvil of the terrorist situation, which it exaggerates betting on it and relying on the existing climate to implement what it couldn't achieve by dodge, procrastination and misinformation.
The difference here does not depend on military achievements, though it is the basis and substance, but in part simulates the political reality and dictates the speech, vocabulary and rhythm through the achievements of the Syrian Arab Army, and puts an end irrevocably to the bet on terrorism, by dropping the lines in their colors, models and grades, when it comes to resolving on the basis of axiom, that what they were unable to achieve by terrorism will not be achieved by procrastination or dodgy, including the erroneous rhetoric that practically fell in front of the army's advance on the borders of Khan Sheikhoun and its surrounding.
Idlib is the same as others. It would have been useful to contribute partly to politics, but when the policy is intractable, the alternatives and options attached to everything related to them, including the Turkish observation points that were a witness to the growth of terrorism, will be neutralized until correcting the path .. to prevent confusion and to put a definite end to promote the accompanying sayings and false statements that swelled on the margins.
Translated by Amal Suleiman Ma'rouf